Lean, R&D and globalization
myths and realities

Texte
Last update: December 26th, 2008
HOME  Portals: 5S   Production Lean Entreprise Maintenance Management Quality Strategy Version française AUTHOR

There is a strong belief about shop floor productivity improvement brought by Lean programs as well as the strategic asset of R&D, both protecting the noblest activities from farming out. These stances have been so often heard and welcomed that they actually turned out as obvious truth.
Yet the challenge about the low cost car could smash this myth and reveal dire realities...


Residuals productivity gains

After farming out productions which could not be optimized regarding the costs and constraints in old Europe and after downcosting the remaining productions with lean programs, the only residuals productivity gains potentials are now located outside of production's scope. In the most advanced companies, the focus of improvement programs moved first onto departments support to production, than on the whole Supply Chain, widening the scope for harvesting further productivity improvements.

A great share of the performance in operations and for the global Supply Chain is tightly related to choices made earlier and upstream, development phase. Many of these choices, on technical or operational levels, cannot be challenged afterwards, as their conversion costs would be unbearable. Therefore the necessity to think Lean globally and from the beginning, in R&D.
Furthermore, R&D itself carries high costs and European engineers are culturally locked by their social and economical contexts and habits, which hinders their search for innovative breakthrough for the low cost vehicle (see Usine Nouvelle article).
In addition, processes in development phase have scarcely undergone Lean programs, so they still hold mostly unnoticed saving potentials.
All this attracts attention upon a stronghold that resisted farming out.

Farming out R&D?

Laws of physics apply likewise everywhere on the globe and Chinese, Indian or Brazilian engineers, most often graduates from the best American or European schools, use the same math, the same softwares. They are (still) less expensive than their western colleagues and share the cultural background of their future customers. This intimate knowledge of local markets and local constrains, as well as local habits give them additional value.

What about experience and know-how? In the context of breakthrough innovation for the low cost car, experience is rather a handicap. Finding new solutions means reconsidering the problem from a new point of view, out of usual frames. Know-how has to be recreated in the new paradigm.

Experience, know-how and technology stealing

What about the risk of technology stealing? In a first time stealing existing technology is nonsense as old or actual solutions do not respond efficiently to the low cost challenge. New innovative solutions will be interesting to purchase, license or adapt onto higher end models for mature markets. If the successful R&D is located in the emerging markets, the technology stealing could go East to West or South to North.


More reading material

Lean R&D. Seeking low cost car
Other resources about Lean and R&D

Top research for
low cost car

"Our French engineers are usued to save cents of euros. To build low cost, it is necessary to count in cents of roupie (1 euro = 60 roupies). Chinese and Indian engineers find solutions we'd never thought about", Bruno Montmerle (Faurecia).

Source : L'Usine Nouvelle magazine 30/08/2007

Translation C. Hohmann

 

Author, Christian HOHMANN is partner, director in charge of Lean and Supply Chain practice at Agamus Consult

Contact the author

Lean Portal

Lean survey in European automotive industry

Etude Lean dans l'automobile

Learn more and/or apply for 2008 issue

2007 Awards


This page was brought to you by ©hris HOHMANN - http://chohmann.free.fr/